EMF Spectrum Frequencies: Virus and Lyme in Multiple Sclerosis

Q. Tell us about this case that has many interested regarding your findings when individuals diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis and nematodes in the reported presence of EMF. You reported that the patient was concerned of local EMF towers, indoor EMF and WIFI and they believed it was related to MS.

R. I must start off by saying it is tragic and it is very unfortunate that there is so much information on the Internet that is frightening people without a full scientific foundation, i.e. evidence. There are many individuals reporting what they read and making numerous erroneous assertions regarding the electron and its presence in the environment and associating them with ill effects. Clients and patients are employing common EMF meter readers that are not highly integrated medical experts for this practice totally  failing the EMF risk assessment for the diagnostic. Risk exposure is a clinical medical determination only for medical experts with a high level of integration with specialized academics, knowledge and experience. That has been my life for over 40 years working with the electron in its every iteration and in my medical research and clinical practice. EMF exposure and risk assessment is a clinical medical technical practice. For you the medical doctors reading this fully understand.

A. "Now to answer your question, I am very moved by the suffering in the many MS cases I have seen. Typically they have been females (80%), mothers(65%) and aged 30-50 this pattern in itself are considered leads in pathogenesis and sympthomology. When elements of the electron are involved I often refer to the patient suffering part by "radiosis" as a condition or disorder caused by environmental elements recognized by scientists's of Spectral Analytical Sciences and the subClinical Research Group. Interestingly medical research publications only reports females are 20-50% of all studies in controlled research.

"In a course of over 20 years in clinical epidemiology and countless patients I have seen, often they being medical doctors, nurses and clinicians that were fully diagnosed or in part with the cancers, parasites, Lyme, neurological disorders including MS and genetic disorders. In many of these cases have provided unexpected and critical diagnostic findings due to my integrations and experience. Fortunately for these individuals medical professionals they were able to identify my work as have something to offer for their diagnosis when no other answers were forthcoming for their condition. I have been working on a new hypothesis that is being formulated in support of the cases where the etiology of MS may be better understood. What I have seen repeatedly that in nearly all of these cases there is a polysymptomatic onset and an identical environmental role and medical etiological finding. There is high complexity for the diagnosis.

Q. What about the presence of EMF fields?

A. We have studied EMF outside of just reading published studies. I have seen some of the highest EMF EMR fields and some of the safest and lowest from EMF of any civilized areas in the US , Canada, EU, UK, Eastern Europe and middle east. In this case a patient diagnosed with both systemic nematodes and MS was surrounded by frequency fields and other indoor factors yet to be disclosed as a presence that are yet not recognizable or have never been reported to have been detected. Once I determined what they were and so identified and eliminated it is expected the symptoms will regress and repair of injury will begin. We shall see."

Q. What was present in this patient's home?

A. The patient had numerous environmental exposure factors in addition to EMF sources that can not be commonly identified because they are unknown to exist by current understanding. During the investigative study I did identify previously unreported factors that causes MS to progress, inhibiting regression and in addition to activating parasites, nematodes, virus (EBV) and Lyme's Borrelia burgdorferi in the presence of newly identified relevant presence once confirmed will be posted here for future publication. If confirmed it will be a major reported finding for this case.

Q. Where does this diagnosis take the patient?

A. There are many complications for the diagnostic in this case and more information is being collected with pending follow-up and studies to be performed before the diagnosis is concluded. Due to these two newly identified and unknown as of yet presence that has built a new industry and technology clearly demonstrable evidence must be presented before the final report. I am 95% confident that the findings in this case when reported will shed new light in understanding the cause and possible prevention of MS and certainly relieve patients of their symptoms and ultimately allow health to return. In the meantime this patient's symptoms will be relieved to the extent time will tell.

Q. What are the complications?

A. Simply found in the complexity in the necessary medical and technical integrations as applied.

There are many that believe that the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb)play a role. Their role is well understood as my patient related studies  in medical mycology related oncology and parasitology that has been ongoing for over 20 years. Spirochetes and their tissue injury play a significant role in many diseases not yet discussed but for MS there are chemolithotrophic cofactors (CC) that lead to other complications as I have seen many with Bb and they have no MS. So what are the cofactors and what are the molecular mechanisms involved is  a question that must be examined. Toxic chemolithotrophs utilizing inorganic energy sources such as sulfur or chemoorganoheterotrophs, utilizing cellular - tissue organic energy sources.

Q. What about the current findings relating to EMF spectrum exposure in general for our readers?

A. The hypothesis regarding MS and EMF as developed during this case is being fully supported by my current research studies and review at U. Pitt. Sch. of Med of previous studies at nearly every level including linking specific epigenetic loci in chromosomes 3,7,11 & 13 to the current working model. The picture is becoming very clear in our EMF related studies as we continue to find evidence to support as our previously discussed reviews of EMF exposure cases covered in the past 15 years.

Q. How soon do you think this study will take?

A. My prior studies in oncology and related mycoses took four years to complete culminating in a published case that has advance and redirected the diagnostic in what was a terminal case. I look forward to publishing our finalized findings when we are satisfied we have a demonstrable empirical model that will be unchallenged. I expect this in less than one year or as time permits.

Q. Any final comments that we need to know or fear about electromagnetic radiation?

R. With the public asking so many questions about the exposure to the electron is  is surprisingly to me there remain many unasked and unanswered questions. In the course of over 20 years working to address the public concerns and fears about exposure, for  myself, having already been there there are no unasked or unanswered questions. There are no mysteries for our scientists. And for most of  the public there need be no concern.

Thank you. Look forward for updating this case.

Yes. Thank you.

Notes: 3-24-19 researchers have been diverted and misdirected for CD4 in re Korngold-dismissed

March 28, 2019

Q. Thank you for the patient follow up call. What do have to share?

A. As a clinical epidemiologist and review editor for major scientific and technical medical publications I have the privilege and responsibility reviewing and editing pre-publication manuscripts for public and and private newly published internal research studies not openly available on the Internet. This included my recent review of five manuscripts submitted for review that involved EMF-EMR exposure studies- Three of these were initially rejected for publication for various technical and control reasons. Under my direction for revision and re-submission and review when corrected for future publication. I In the past few weeks and with considerable consultations with, clients, patients, clinicians and medical scientific associates regarding MS, the patients clinical review and study is now current and very well understood by the subClincal Research Group regarding the initiation, promotion and progression of this disorder.

Additionally I was very pleased to hear from the patient that she has been receiving highly attentive and caring medical attention and supportive care in the course of her recovery. Caring and kindness is needed for recovery and sometimes this seems absent in patient care.

Q. What is you current current opinion on the causes?

A. First causation: The problem with understanding MS is the multiple level of study from the organic molecules, the organisms including virus, bacteria, nematodes, spirochetes and the pleomorphs, then the tissue and organs. Then the environmental including diet, a patients immediate surroundings including all forms of radiation that we have studied for over 20 years, and many other factors we consider during our subClinical Investigations™.

Q. How do they cause MS?

A. It will vary from patient to patient based upon our review of their medical history since they all contribute to this disorder based upon our diagnostic model.

Q. What guidance do you wish to give people that have MS?

A. Having seen the many with MS a consultation reviewing their medical history and current diagnostic status may indicated as full clinical environmental health risk assessment may be required as such risk factors may continue to promote MS and or prevent the healing or recovery of patients. Such may explain why some patients start to recover and the relapse as in many cases we have seen and reviewed. Patients may contact us for more clinical epidemiological review of their health status and additional information.

April 6, 2019 status update.

The MS patient has become concerned due to a lay piece of paper from Canadian website that sells meters and cites out of clinical context EMF readings that are clearly alarmist promoting such meters. I have on many occasions testified as an expert in medical and EMF related technical cases and in the review of other professional findings in all cases have dismissed similar weak hearsay reports. Such papers must be disregarded or only proffered by medical doctors and when not they must state to include saying that they are not medical, technical or any court certified related specialists. Therefore it is only hearsay, as lay opinions without any authoritative medical standing. Understand this, just because it is written does not give it scientific validity absent a rigorous peer review process.

April 10, 2019 update II

Patient asked to consider a video about EMF. A review finds video clip of cells and EMF exposure and interviews of individuals discussing EMF cut, copied and pasted into this lengthy alarmist video much of it from many years ago having all that have been reviewed long ago here at Spectral. We suggest people"going to medical school" and get an organized education rather than piecing together floating hearsay from the internet and then claiming as "knowing" about EMF exposure. It takes many years sacrificing of ones' life to become a dedicated medical expert in specialized areas. Unfortunately there are overnight self appoint EMF consultants seeking to make quick profit using fear and confusion thereby terrorizing patients and then offer to sell them inspection services, gadgets and other services causing more illness and distress in patients and failing to understand or address the primary reason for the call.

RETURN TO TOC

E-mail for EMF Health Related Questions

EMFMedicalExpert@gmail.com 

973-726-9559       NJ NY PA CT DE       347-491-9867

Clinical Environment In the News© 2050(CEIN)

Copyright 2019 subClinical.org